Posts by Persch, Patrick J.

1) Message boards : Number crunching : Higher Limit ? (Message 384)
Posted 15 May 2009 by Profile Persch, Patrick J.
Post:
You don't need a higher limit. By keeping it where it is you move the work to the most machines. At this stage that gives you the best sampling against how your Wu's are holding up. I do like the new Wu's and the point structure. It's more in line with the average. Patrick
2) Message boards : Number crunching : Boincstats Bam Warning (Message 383)
Posted 15 May 2009 by Profile Persch, Patrick J.
Post:
If you use Bam with this project be careful. After you select from the " sign up for projects list" ( its listed under projects that do not accept new members) and have it look for your account you MUST go to the host list and attach each of your machines even though it is already there. I synchronized with Bam and it reset and detached the project because I did not attach it in the host list. I lost about 150 WU's and you can't get them back after you reattach because your at your 200 quota limit for the day. Probably best to do this when your out of work. Take Care, Patrick
3) Message boards : Number crunching : Very short Wu´s, very low Credit´s (Message 265)
Posted 13 May 2009 by Profile Persch, Patrick J.
Post:
I don't know, the points really don't matter at this stage. Your getting the project started. I do have to look at a .02 pending and I know these are not finishing under a minute. That's .0003, it's off by a factor of 20. The machine I am referencing usually pulls a .06 on average projects. I'll run it for a day and adjust the average over 24 hours. I do want to say the Wu's run well. They definitely use the machine, I'll try running freehal and others alongside to see how it goes. I've only seen a couple of projects out of the gate but yours seems very stable, good job. I hope your project is around for awhile, good science. Later, Patrick



©2017 All rights reserved | Design by Digital BioPharm Ltd