estimated runtime of autodock WUs

Message boards : Number crunching : estimated runtime of autodock WUs

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile [B^S] Dimitrij

Send message
Joined: 1 May 09
Posts: 3
Credit: 1,649
RAC: 0
Message 1583 - Posted: 21 Oct 2009, 12:25:09 UTC

can you tell me what the estimated runtime of an autodock WU is on a -let's say- 2 Ghz machine. Is it normal that the progress bar isn't moving correctly? is there no checkpointing in this app?

another thing: what can i do when i entered my profile in the database "correctly" like it says but when i try to watch it, it say user has no profile !???

thanks for an answer
Dimitrij
ID: 1583 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile Tim Turner
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 May 09
Posts: 570
Credit: 184,322
RAC: 0
Message 1584 - Posted: 21 Oct 2009, 16:15:24 UTC - in response to Message 1583.  

yea, jack still has some work to do on the progress bar and checkpointing... but these should take 1 hour at the most.

we never got the profile problem fixed...this is another matter into itself.
Tim Turner
Public Relations Admin
Secunia PSI: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/
If you need help via voice or Convo; PM me and i will give you details on where i will be; Teamspeak, Yahoo Messenger, or Skype.
ID: 1584 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile Jack Shultz
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 10 Apr 09
Posts: 503
Credit: 120,150
RAC: 0
Message 1586 - Posted: 21 Oct 2009, 18:46:06 UTC - in response to Message 1583.  

I'll have to figure that profile thing when I get some more time. First priority is making sure people get work and the server does not overflow.
ID: 1586 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile [B^S] Dimitrij

Send message
Joined: 1 May 09
Posts: 3
Credit: 1,649
RAC: 0
Message 1589 - Posted: 21 Oct 2009, 20:32:02 UTC

thanks for the answer, guys, the profile thingi is really a less important matter.
ID: 1589 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile Jack Shultz
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 10 Apr 09
Posts: 503
Credit: 120,150
RAC: 0
Message 1641 - Posted: 28 Oct 2009, 17:47:16 UTC - in response to Message 1589.  

is this working correctly now?
ID: 1641 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile [B^S] Dimitrij

Send message
Joined: 1 May 09
Posts: 3
Credit: 1,649
RAC: 0
Message 1643 - Posted: 28 Oct 2009, 18:37:53 UTC - in response to Message 1641.  

is this working correctly now?



if you referr to the profile thing, NO, it still doesn't work for me :-(

wu's run good now
ID: 1643 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : estimated runtime of autodock WUs


©2017 All rights reserved | Design by Digital BioPharm Ltd